I love to cook, but somehow I always seem to invite complication into my kitchen.
As a preteen I developed an intense pride in making food 'from scratch'. It made me feel a bit like Laura Ingles Wilder. I remember my baby brother waddling over to me waving a box of brownie mix in his hand, asking me to bake brownies for him. I put on a big-sister smile and raised my voice an octave as I said, I'm sorry sweetie, but I can't. Pouring something into a pan out of a box doesn't count as baking. Then I dedicated the next two hours to making brownies from scratch even though I doubt his tiny taste buds appreciated my efforts.
In my mid-twenties I became obsessed with using the healthiest ingredients possible, though that didn't necessarily add complication to cooking so much as it added expense to my grocery store excursions. Shortly thereafter, however, I declared myself a raw-foodist for a brief period, and my culinary creativity was stretched thin.
The karmic cycle repeated when I moved to Europe and married a vegan, thus forcing me to come up with a whole new bag of tricks in the kitchen. I'd had no idea the extent to which I'd previously relied on eggs, cheese, and milk. At first I simply didn't cook for him - I let him cook for me. Romantic, right? And educational. But it didn't take long before I got tired of eating the same three meals, so I sought out vegan blogs and recipe sites, figuring out how to make something yummy that didn't inconvenience any animals.
I soon realized that the majority of vegan recipes are written by people who have access to places like Whole Foods Market. Specialty food stores are not as ubiquitous in Europe as they are in California. When I do come across an organic shop here, it tends to be very small and quite expensive. Sweden is better than Italy was as far as availability of obscure products is concerned, though it's still hit or miss regarding whether or not I'll be able to find xanthiam gum or kombu. The combined challenges of finding the names of odd ingredients in the local language, locating them, and being able to afford them keeps my excursions to health-food shops to a minimum. (May I just rant for just a moment? At the ecological market I frequented in Pisa I couldn't even find simple rolled oats, and when I asked the clerk if she could order kombucha from her supplier she had to look it up online to know what it was. The answer was no: kombucha was not even available as a special order. Argh! I had my choice of three different brands and eight different flavors of kombucha at the normal grocery store in California!)
So I've learned to seek out recipes that focus on standard ingredients. Absolutely nothing fancy. Even some rather standard ingredients that we take for granted as
Americans are unheard of in Europe. I've given up hope of finding
shortening here. And once in a while I ask Dad to include a container of baking powder when he sends a care package ... not because baking powder
doesn't exist here - it does - but the baking powder I find in Europe is single-acting rather than double-acting; it behaves and
tastes entirely different than what I buy at home.
And I find that regardless of the ingredients, it's still a challenge to whip up American recipes here in Europe. You see, in America we measure everything differently. I'm not just talking about imperial measurements instead of metric - gallons rather than liters. We also differ from Europeans because we tend to measure by volume - by how much of an ingredient can fit into a given space. This actually works just fine, even though it's not the most scientific method. It doesn't present any problem for liquid ingredients, but the volume taken up by a dry ingredient will vary according to the way an ingredient is handled. Therefore our recipes refer to packed brown sugar, and heaping teaspoons. Ours is a culture of approximation. And that's the beauty of America, isn't it? Exactly how hard should you pack the brown sugar? As hard as you damn well please. We're a country of rugged individualists, and though we recognize the utility of using a recipe as a guideline, we take pride in creating a finished product that is the result of our individual interpretations.
Not so in Europe. The first time I saw my husband cook, I thought he was joking. He was an undergrad in physics at the time, and he cooked as though the kitchen was his laboratory. He pulled out a small scale and weighed each ingredient to the gram. I can see now that this is advantageous for making something like souffle, but he was just making spaghetti. C'mon, don't you just grab a big hand full of spaghetti and toss it in a pot? If you make too much, there'll be leftovers for tomorrow's lunch. But I've since learned that Italians aren't nearly as excited about leftovers as we are in America, and that precision cooking is a practice that goes beyond my favorite physicist's kitchen.
I've now come to appreciate cooking according to a European recipe's measuring system. There's less to clean up when you eliminate the middle man from the measuring practice. The bowl rests on the scale and you hit reset after adding each ingredient. Each ingredient is poured, slowly, into the bowl until the correct weight is reached. But this really only works with European recipes. Converting an American recipe from volume-based cups to weighted measurements involves more than a few calculations from imperial units to metric; you also have to keep in mind that each ingredient will be converted differently because it's weight to volume ratio is different. A cup of flour, depending on the type of flour, will weigh anywhere from 110 to 135 grams. A cup of rolled oats weighs 85 grams and a cup of chocolate chips weighs 152 grams. A cup of shortening weighs 205 grams, and lest you think that I should quit griping about Europe's shortening deficiency and use butter instead, let me set the record straight that a cup of butter weighs 227 grams. Translating an American recipe into something useful in European culture requires a fair amount of research and above average math skills.
I received a gift in the mail recently from my best friend in California. A simple thing, really, but it's made such a difference in my life. It's a set of measuring cups and spoons. Even though I figured out long ago that one American cup equals 236 milliliters, and I marked one of my glasses with a permanent marker at the 236 ml line, recipes never turned out so well with that method as they do now with these nesting cups and spoons. Thanks for the lifeline, Emily!
Thursday, 30 August 2012
Cooking like an American
Labels:
baking,
cooking,
cups,
from scratch,
frustration,
grams,
health food stores,
imperial,
Italy,
Laura Ingles Wilder,
metric,
ounces,
recipe,
Sweden,
vegan,
vegetarian,
volume,
weight
Sunday, 5 August 2012
Duty From Afar
Leaving home and making a life in a new land has presented it's share of challenges. I'm currently struggling through learning my third foreign language. Becoming employed within a new society is rarely easy. There are some culinary pleasures that the grocery stores outside of America cannot provide (oh how I crave root beer, Reese's peanut butter cups, and cornbread!). And then there's that inescapable hassle: governmental bureaucracy.
Bureaucratic interaction was also a part of my life in the States. Every four years I had to renew my drivers license. There were a few occasions when I bought or sold a car I had to interact with DMV to transfer the registration. Once I had my car stolen and had to file a police report. I remember occasionally feeling exasperated listening to the same song over and over while hold with some official office, or explaining the details of my case to Person X who then tells me I had better call Person Y, who then transfers me to Person Z, who informs me that Person X is the one who handles this type of situation.
But since uprooting my life and planting myself in new soil, I have had to learn to fine-tune my bureaucratic patience. Getting married to an Italian involved a mountain of paperwork and a complex choreography of interaction between several bureaucratic offices in both of our countries. Becoming an Italian resident was an adventure in forms, translations, photocopies, official stamps, and a favors from a friend of a friend. Obtaining Swedish residency seemed more straightforward at the onset, but lately we've run into complications that have made us seriously consider just giving up and moving back to Italy.
On top of this, I received a jury duty summons last week. From a California courthouse. It arrived at my mother's house, which I continue to use as my permanent mailing address. The same thing happened about a year and a half ago, when I was living in Italy. At that time I called the Jury Commissioner's office and explained that I'm no longer living in California, that I'm married to a European and making my life outside of America. The person I spoke to back then was very nice - she said that I should just fax in my juror form with I am not domiciled in the State of California checked, along with a letter of explanation and a copy of my passport showing my stamp of entry into the EU. It was easy to do and it required a minimal expenditure of time and energy. I thought the problem was solved, so it surprised me to get the déjà vu email from mom: "You've got a jury duty summons here, what would you like me to do with it?"
I called the court office and briefly recounted my situation to the woman on the phone, ending with "I sent in a letter last year explaining I live outside the US, so I'm confused that I'm receiving another summons." She told me that the letter last year only excused me from jury duty last year, that I'd have to fax in another letter this time, and that I should expect to continue receiving jury duty notices in the future. She went on to inform me that sending in a letter would probably work this time, and maybe even next time, but that after a while this method wouldn't effectively excuse me from serving jury duty and I'd eventually be held in contempt of court.
Whoa. Contempt of court. I've heard those words on TV, and I don't like the sound of them. I asked what I could do to stop receiving summons, and her advice was that I call California's Department of Motor Vehicles and cancel my drivers license. I asked if she was serious. "Yes, ma'am." I suggested that there must be some other solution; that my situation couldn't be so unusual. "This is what we tell everyone in your situation," she informed me, "There's nothing we can do about it at this office - you'll have to call DMV."
In case it isn't obvious, let me state that I really don't want to cancel my California drivers license. I don't go home so often, but when I do I generally have occasional access to a car and I like to be able to get around that way. I've tried navigating southern California via bicycle and public transportation, and it wasn't a particularly enjoyable experiment. Plus, my California drivers license affords me permission to drive in Europe for one year from the issuance date of my Italian and Swedish residencies. Giving up my license would have an immediate unwanted effect on my life.
The first thing I did was call my embassy. They're the ones who help Americans living outside America, right? The operator told me that there was nothing they could do for me; that they handle federal issues and jury duty is the jurisdiction of the state.
The next step was to call DMV. With the time difference it was a little tricky to call at a moment that didn't have a ridiculously long wait time, and when I finally spoke to a human, he didn't know what advice to give because he'd never heard of a situation like mine. "We are obliged to give the courts a list of names of licensed drivers every six months," he told me, "and there's no way to have your name removed from that list." I informed him of the jury commissioner's suggestion of canceling my drivers license and he was as disbelieving as I had been. He went on to suggest that cancelling my drivers license wouldn't necessarily solve the problem because the courts also receive a list of names from the Registrar of Voters. I told him to ixnay the ancellationcay, and I called the Registrar of Voters.
The woman who answered at the Registrar's office listened sympathetically to my problem, but said the same thing as DMV had said - that they have no choice about providing the court with a list of names of registered voters. She kindly helped me to register as a permanent absentee voter, but told me that this status makes no difference with regard to my name's presence on the list given to the jury commissioner. She also told me that according to California election code 2025, I have the right to maintain my last residential address in California as my voting address / district even though I'm living out of the country now. Her reference to rights and codes got me thinking about a strongly worded letter I might send the jury commissioner, and I called DMV again, this time with the intention of arming myself with a knowledge of my rights.
I dialed the general number at DMV and asked if it was a problem from a legal standpoint that I maintain my California drivers license even though I live outside of California. I was transferred to the Public Inquiry Department where a very nice woman listened to my situation and sided squarely with me. I asked her if she could cite some vehicular code that would confirm this right, and she put me on hold while she went to look it up. A few minutes later she returned and told me she had bad news: the only code applicable to this situation was California vehicle code 17460, which says that by accepting a drivers license I have consented to obey any "summons" that are sent to me whether I am living in California or not. She seemed to believe that "summons" generally referred to being held responsible for legal infractions - parking tickets and whatnot - but that the Jury Commissioner could reference this code in asserting their right to oblige me to serve jury duty based on my possession of a drivers license.
Damn. There went my strongly worded self-righteous letter plan.
I felt defeated, but I still felt rebellious. I followed the Jury Commissioner's instructions, mailing in my juror form, copies of various official documents confirming my existence outside of California, and a letter of explanation. The letter (below) was meant to draw attention to the absurdity of my situation, and hopefully put a smile on the face of the human who receives it. I doubt it will solve my problem for the long term, but I doubt it will make anything worse either. Perhaps I'll have some new ideas of how to deal with this situation by the time the next jury summons arrives. Maybe I'll have a Swedish drivers license by then, or as several folks have suggested, perhaps contempt of court are words with a strong bark but no bite. One friend has suggested I might receive help from my representative in Congress if I contact him, but at this point I've mailed my letter to the Riverside County Courts and I'm gladly putting this issue out of my head. I've got plenty of other bureaucratic strings to untangle.
Bureaucratic interaction was also a part of my life in the States. Every four years I had to renew my drivers license. There were a few occasions when I bought or sold a car I had to interact with DMV to transfer the registration. Once I had my car stolen and had to file a police report. I remember occasionally feeling exasperated listening to the same song over and over while hold with some official office, or explaining the details of my case to Person X who then tells me I had better call Person Y, who then transfers me to Person Z, who informs me that Person X is the one who handles this type of situation.
But since uprooting my life and planting myself in new soil, I have had to learn to fine-tune my bureaucratic patience. Getting married to an Italian involved a mountain of paperwork and a complex choreography of interaction between several bureaucratic offices in both of our countries. Becoming an Italian resident was an adventure in forms, translations, photocopies, official stamps, and a favors from a friend of a friend. Obtaining Swedish residency seemed more straightforward at the onset, but lately we've run into complications that have made us seriously consider just giving up and moving back to Italy.
On top of this, I received a jury duty summons last week. From a California courthouse. It arrived at my mother's house, which I continue to use as my permanent mailing address. The same thing happened about a year and a half ago, when I was living in Italy. At that time I called the Jury Commissioner's office and explained that I'm no longer living in California, that I'm married to a European and making my life outside of America. The person I spoke to back then was very nice - she said that I should just fax in my juror form with I am not domiciled in the State of California checked, along with a letter of explanation and a copy of my passport showing my stamp of entry into the EU. It was easy to do and it required a minimal expenditure of time and energy. I thought the problem was solved, so it surprised me to get the déjà vu email from mom: "You've got a jury duty summons here, what would you like me to do with it?"
I called the court office and briefly recounted my situation to the woman on the phone, ending with "I sent in a letter last year explaining I live outside the US, so I'm confused that I'm receiving another summons." She told me that the letter last year only excused me from jury duty last year, that I'd have to fax in another letter this time, and that I should expect to continue receiving jury duty notices in the future. She went on to inform me that sending in a letter would probably work this time, and maybe even next time, but that after a while this method wouldn't effectively excuse me from serving jury duty and I'd eventually be held in contempt of court.
Whoa. Contempt of court. I've heard those words on TV, and I don't like the sound of them. I asked what I could do to stop receiving summons, and her advice was that I call California's Department of Motor Vehicles and cancel my drivers license. I asked if she was serious. "Yes, ma'am." I suggested that there must be some other solution; that my situation couldn't be so unusual. "This is what we tell everyone in your situation," she informed me, "There's nothing we can do about it at this office - you'll have to call DMV."
In case it isn't obvious, let me state that I really don't want to cancel my California drivers license. I don't go home so often, but when I do I generally have occasional access to a car and I like to be able to get around that way. I've tried navigating southern California via bicycle and public transportation, and it wasn't a particularly enjoyable experiment. Plus, my California drivers license affords me permission to drive in Europe for one year from the issuance date of my Italian and Swedish residencies. Giving up my license would have an immediate unwanted effect on my life.
The first thing I did was call my embassy. They're the ones who help Americans living outside America, right? The operator told me that there was nothing they could do for me; that they handle federal issues and jury duty is the jurisdiction of the state.
The next step was to call DMV. With the time difference it was a little tricky to call at a moment that didn't have a ridiculously long wait time, and when I finally spoke to a human, he didn't know what advice to give because he'd never heard of a situation like mine. "We are obliged to give the courts a list of names of licensed drivers every six months," he told me, "and there's no way to have your name removed from that list." I informed him of the jury commissioner's suggestion of canceling my drivers license and he was as disbelieving as I had been. He went on to suggest that cancelling my drivers license wouldn't necessarily solve the problem because the courts also receive a list of names from the Registrar of Voters. I told him to ixnay the ancellationcay, and I called the Registrar of Voters.
The woman who answered at the Registrar's office listened sympathetically to my problem, but said the same thing as DMV had said - that they have no choice about providing the court with a list of names of registered voters. She kindly helped me to register as a permanent absentee voter, but told me that this status makes no difference with regard to my name's presence on the list given to the jury commissioner. She also told me that according to California election code 2025, I have the right to maintain my last residential address in California as my voting address / district even though I'm living out of the country now. Her reference to rights and codes got me thinking about a strongly worded letter I might send the jury commissioner, and I called DMV again, this time with the intention of arming myself with a knowledge of my rights.
I dialed the general number at DMV and asked if it was a problem from a legal standpoint that I maintain my California drivers license even though I live outside of California. I was transferred to the Public Inquiry Department where a very nice woman listened to my situation and sided squarely with me. I asked her if she could cite some vehicular code that would confirm this right, and she put me on hold while she went to look it up. A few minutes later she returned and told me she had bad news: the only code applicable to this situation was California vehicle code 17460, which says that by accepting a drivers license I have consented to obey any "summons" that are sent to me whether I am living in California or not. She seemed to believe that "summons" generally referred to being held responsible for legal infractions - parking tickets and whatnot - but that the Jury Commissioner could reference this code in asserting their right to oblige me to serve jury duty based on my possession of a drivers license.
Damn. There went my strongly worded self-righteous letter plan.
I felt defeated, but I still felt rebellious. I followed the Jury Commissioner's instructions, mailing in my juror form, copies of various official documents confirming my existence outside of California, and a letter of explanation. The letter (below) was meant to draw attention to the absurdity of my situation, and hopefully put a smile on the face of the human who receives it. I doubt it will solve my problem for the long term, but I doubt it will make anything worse either. Perhaps I'll have some new ideas of how to deal with this situation by the time the next jury summons arrives. Maybe I'll have a Swedish drivers license by then, or as several folks have suggested, perhaps contempt of court are words with a strong bark but no bite. One friend has suggested I might receive help from my representative in Congress if I contact him, but at this point I've mailed my letter to the Riverside County Courts and I'm gladly putting this issue out of my head. I've got plenty of other bureaucratic strings to untangle.
Riverside Office of the Jury Commissioner
PO Box 400
Riverside, CA 92502-0400
July 17, 2012
Dear Jury Commissioner,
I regret to inform you that I am not available to fulfill the duty to which I have recently been called. My badge will not sit proudly upon my breast, for I am at this time incapable of participating in the judicial system of Our Great State. Woefully, I am not currently domiciled in the State of California, but in Europe, and I am unable to procure the funds necessary to transport myself to 4100 Main Street, despite my heartfelt desire to fulfill my civic duty.
You see, I have entered into the sacred bonds of a transatlantic matrimony, and please believe me when I say that the pang of regret that I feel at my current inability to participate in America’s esteemed legal system is but one among a great many difficulties that I have undertaken to endure by joining my life to a partner who shares my undying love of country, but who harbors a pointedly different opinion as to exactly which country on God’s earth is most deserving of our love.
I maintain the Californian address of #### Riverside // 92507 (my childhood home) as a mailing address and in fact as my permanent address, for I shall not give up my dream of someday returning to The Land of Liberty, and breathing in the smell of freedom; indeed it is still America I think of when I hear the word home. However I am currently domiciled (and expect to remain domiciled for the next two years) at #### // 41258 Göteborg // Sweden while my husband pursues his higher education, after which time he insists we shall return to his beloved Italy so as to live as near as possible his mother.
Mr. Commissioner, please understand that I swore a vow before almighty God that I would love, honor, and obey my husband. More specifically, I swore di amare, onorare e rispettare, and Italians take these words quite seriously, particularly the rispettare part. If I were to break with this oath, even for so high a calling as that of serving the great judicial system upon which America was founded, then there would remain no honor in my countenance to render me worthy of wearing the title Juror, now nor in the future. For this reason I cannot promise with any certainty when in the future I might be available to make my offering of service to the Superior Court of California; I can only underscore that my current inability weighs heavy upon my conscience.
Enclosed is a copy of my Swedish residence permit, my Swedish residence card, my Italian marriage certificate, and my US passport. If you desire any further information or documentation you need only ask. I can be contacted at my Swedish address (above), via email (vickers.jaime@gmail.com), or on my Swedish mobile phone (011 46 070 ####).
God bless America,
Jaime Vickers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)